DSpace Repository

Effectiveness of neural mobilization versus static Stretching for the treatment of radiating low back pain patients.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Islam, Sumaiya
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-17T04:27:47Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-17T04:27:47Z
dc.date.issued 2019-10-12
dc.identifier.citation Includes bibliographical references (page 57-66 ) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/777
dc.description This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: To identify the effectiveness of Neural Mobilization and Static Stretching for the treatment of radiating low back pain patients and also to determine which treatment is superior to the other. Experimental design of quantitative research which was Clinical Trial design was chosen because the experimental study was the best way to find out the effectiveness of the study. Objectives: To explore socio-demographic (age, gender, educational status, occupation) characteristics of patients with radiating low back pain. To compare the rating of pain intensity before and after Neural Mobilization with conventional physiotherapy in one group and Static Stretching with conventional physiotherapy in another group. To compare the functional disability before and after Neural Mobilization with conventional physiotherapy in one group and Static Stretching with conventional physiotherapy in another group. Methodology: This study was conducted by Clinical Trail study design in which a total 42 participants were selected randomly included 21 in Group A and 21 in Group B. Data was collected by using Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire to evaluate disability level and pain measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale questionnaire. SPSS was used for data analysis which was displayed through table, pie chart, bar chart and parametric test- paired t-test and unpaired or unrelated t-test & Non-parametric test – Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed-Rank test & Mann Whitney U test. Results: In this study, the result shows a significant improvement in more reduction of pain in Group A by using Neural Mobilization with conventional physiotherapy & more reduction of disability in Group B by using Static Stretching with conventional physiotherapy. Conclusion: The result of this study suggest that both Neural Mobilization with conventional physiotherapy and Static Stretching with conventional physiotherapy was effective for radiating low back pain patients but Neural Mobilization was more effective than Static Stretching in reducing pain but Static Stretching was more effective in reducing disability than Neural Mobilization. Key words: Radiating low back pain, Neural Mobilization, Static Stretching, Conventional Physiotherapy, Pain and Disability en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject Radiating low back pain en_US
dc.subject Neural Mobilization en_US
dc.subject Static Stretching en_US
dc.subject Conventional Physiotherapy en_US
dc.subject Pain and Disability. en_US
dc.title Effectiveness of neural mobilization versus static Stretching for the treatment of radiating low back pain patients. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account