dc.contributor.author |
Huda, Nazmul |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-02-20T09:28:55Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-02-20T09:28:55Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-08-12 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Bibliographical Referencing pages 55-55 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/718 |
|
dc.description |
This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Purpose: The study was conducted to identify and investigate the therapeutic
effectiveness of Maitland mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy and
Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy for the treatment of knee
osteoarthritis. This study has made the comparison, in order to discover the most
effective treatment protocol to alleviate the symptoms of the condition. Objectives: To
assess the effect on pain after introducing of Maitland mobilization along with
conventional physiotherapy Mulligan mobilization along with conventional
physiotherapy for knee osteoarthritis patient, to measure the severity of pain by using
Numeric pain rated scale (NPRS) to identify the severity of pain, to assess functional
disability by western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index
(WOMAC).Methodology: A randomized clinical trial was conducted. 14 samples were
randomly selected into 2 groups from Musculoskeletal Unit, Physiotherapy Department,
Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Savar. Initially all the subjects were
assessed by Peripheral Assessment Form at the clinical settings and then data were
collected by questionnaires, Numeric pain rated scale (NPRS) was used to assess pain
intensity and using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) for
functional disability of the patients. Experimental GroupA receivedof Maitland
mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy while experimental Group Breceived
Mulligan mobilization along with conventional physiotherapy. Results: The study has
used statistical analysis by paired t test and unrelated t test to compare the Experimental
group A and Experimental Group B and analyses by interpreting the probability level of
significance of t value. The results were found to be significant for t value. Conclusion:
The study concludes that the Mulligan mobilization with conventional physiotherapy
technique is significantly capable of producing beneficial effects on pain reduction.
Keywords: Maitland mobilization, Mulligan mobilization, Osteoarthritis. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Maitland mobilization |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Mulligan mobilization |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Osteoarthritis |
en_US |
dc.title |
Comparison between maitland mobilization with Conventional physiotherapy and mulligan mobilization with conventional physiotherapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis patient at CRP. |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |