DSpace Repository

Effectiveness of mulligan mobilization with conventional physiotherapy for knee osteoarthritis : a randomized controlled trial.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hossen, Al-Amin
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-08T09:37:17Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-08T09:37:17Z
dc.date.issued 2024-11-15
dc.identifier.citation Includes bibliographical references (page 45-52) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1215
dc.description This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Osteoarthritis (OA), or degenerative joint disease, is characterized by the degradation of articular cartilage. This results in damage to the underlying bone and the development of osteophytes at the joint margins. Osteoarthritis is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder that impacts synovial joints, resulting in pain and restricted mobility for several people worldwide. Methodology: This research employs a randomized, single-blind controlled trial. A total of 32 adult patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis (OA) engaged in the study. The outcome measures included the following: We used the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess pain intensity throughout various activities and use a goniometer for calculating range of motion (ROM). We used the Oxford Grading System and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index to evaluate muscle strength and functional activities. Results: The study demonstrated significant improvements in pain, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, and functional outcomes in the experimental group. We observed significant decreases in pain during resting (p = 0.000), sitting (p = 0.000), standing (p = 0.001), walking (p = 0.001), activities of daily living (p = 0.001), and weight-bearing (p = 0.001). The range of motion (ROM) significantly improved in both active and passive flexion and extension (p<0.001), and muscle strength exhibited notable enhancement in knee extension (p = 0.004); however, knee flexion was non- significant (p = 0.317). Between-group analysis indicated no significant variations in range of motion, with comparable outcomes for knee extension and flexion (p = 0.723 and p = 0.075). The WOMAC scores selected the experimental group, while the differences between groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.157). The intervention greatly improved pain management, range of motion, muscle strength, and functional outcomes in the experimental group. Conclusions: In individuals diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis (OA), mobilization with movement (MWM) has demonstrated greater effectiveness compared to conventional treatments in alleviating pain, enhancing range of motion (ROM), increasing muscle strength, and improving functional results. Keywords: Knee Osteoarthritis, Mulligan’s (MWM), Conventional Physiotherapy. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.subject Knee Osteoarthritis en_US
dc.subject Mulligan’s (MWM) en_US
dc.subject Conventional Physiotherapy. en_US
dc.title Effectiveness of mulligan mobilization with conventional physiotherapy for knee osteoarthritis : a randomized controlled trial. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account