Developing a successful application for research funding (Record no. 36)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02051cas a2200169 a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field J-000001
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 120123s9999 xx r poo 0 0eng d
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Madden, Sue
222 #0 - KEY TITLE
Key title Physiotherapy
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Developing a successful application for research funding
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 518-522
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Journal article print
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Increasing competition for research funding means that the majority of researchers who apply for funding at any one time are likely to be unsuccessful. This paper identifies some of the key issues which need to considered in developing applications for research funding and explores ways in which these issues can be managed in order to maximise the chances of applications being successful. Preparing grant applications takes time and the initial planning stages of identifying a research idea developing the research team and identifying an appropriate funder are neccessary first steps. The content of the proposal should comprise details of what is known about the topic, what the research is about, what it is trying to achieve, how it will be undertaken, what will be learnt from it, and why it is worth doing. Consideration must also be given to the issues raised by the Research Governance Framework which need to be taken into account in preparing an application. Careful preparation of the budget is necessary as, once an award for funding is made, it is generally not possible to ask for further funding if the amount needed is greater than expected. Plans for dissemination are also important and should include distribution to research participants as well as to the professional and scientific community. The competitive nature of research funding means that successful grant writing is increasingly likely to involve repeated re-submissions of a re-drafted application and researchers need to be willing to learn from feedback provided through the peer review process.
650 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Research funding
General subdivision Research governance
-- Research ethics
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Wiles, Rose.
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
        BHPI CRP LIbrary BHPI CRP LIbrary 2013-05-25 Vol. 89, No. 9, September 2003 2013-05-25 1 2013-05-25 Journals, eBooks, Papers, Articles, Magazines


Last Updated April 2017
Copyright © CRP Library
Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP)